Quick attach options

North Idaho Wolfman said:

That adapter moves it out the same distance as the SSQA adapter, so that point is moot.
And the difference in weight between the two is very small.
I've had zero issues with bent levers or anything like that and I run it on my tractor and my Bobcat so I don't really see the issue there.
You can buy just about any implement in SSQA, where you would have to make your implements to fit a pin on set up.
But to each there own, use whatever you think is best for you.

G-Top supply professional and honest service.

Click to expand...

No&#;it does not move it out the same distance&#;because it is smaller than the distance created by the SSQA hardware. And the difference in weight is not small&#;it is 3 or 4 times more (than the suggestion offered) with the SSQA on the loader-side..and even more on the implement side) of which the pin-on implement suffers Zero additional weight because it is unchanged&#;.it remains &#;pin on&#;.

You&#;ve had zero issues with bent levers because you&#;re a better/more-experienced user than most. These forums have more than one example of failed SSQA equipment because the user had brush or other interference bend and &#;jam&#; the levers so that they then fail to work.&#;OR&#;the SSQA gets bent when the loader is stressed Un-Equally such as when picking up a long log, etc. In-fact, you are the person who&#;s been most helpful in pointing out that users have to be careful not to damage their fragile SSQA levers when using grapples and similar implements that might contact the debris or material when using the system.

You can buy/find just about any implement in pin-on style ..&#; many times more in the used market&#;..in fact, pin on is the Original style for tractor FELs and is common in older equipment.. However, we will agree, most NEW implements are offered in SSQA and if one is buying a NEW tractor that is likely the best choice&#;. BUT&#;the problem remains for many buyers of Used equipment which is still &#;pin on&#; &#;and I&#;m only suggesting an alternative to the standard/common recommendation to spend a lot of money and give up more lifting capacity converting to SSQA they may not need&#;than a simpler system which MAY be exactly all they need.

It has been especially satisfactory for me.

No&#;it does not move it out the same distance&#;because it is smaller than the distance created by the SSQA hardware. And the difference in weight is not small&#;it is 3 or 4 times more (than the suggestion offered) with the SSQA on the loader-side..and even more on the implement side) of which the pin-on implement suffers Zero additional weight because it is unchanged&#;.it remains &#;pin on&#;.You&#;ve had zero issues with bent levers because you&#;re a better/more-experienced user than most. These forums have more than one example of failed SSQA equipment because the user had brush or other interference bend and &#;jam&#; the levers so that they then fail to work.&#;OR&#;the SSQA gets bent when the loader is stressed Un-Equally such as when picking up a long log, etc. In-fact, you are the person who&#;s been most helpful in pointing out that users have to be careful not to damage their fragile SSQA levers when using grapples and similar implements that might contact the debris or material when using the system.You can buy/find just about any implement in pin-on style ..&#; many times more in the used market&#;..in fact, pin on is the Original style for tractor FELs and is common in older equipment.. However, we will agree, most NEW implements are offered in SSQA and if one is buying a NEW tractor that is likely the best choice&#;. BUT&#;the problem remains for many buyers of Used equipment which is still &#;pin on&#; &#;and I&#;m only suggesting an alternative to the standard/common recommendation to spend a lot of money and give up more lifting capacity converting to SSQA they may not need&#;than a simpler system which MAY be exactly all they need.It has been especially satisfactory for me.

The company is the world’s best Allbucketteeth.Com Bucket Adapter supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.

I always thought FEL "quick attach" was "quick attach"! Obviously I was wrong. I must assume from the size of the holes vs. attachment weight that this has something to do with different weight or strength ratings. Can anyone direct me to a website or document that explains the different lower mounting hole configurations that I am seeing on quick attach buckets and what they mean???

Dougster

Here I go again showing my lack of smarts, but can anyone explain to me the differences I am seeing in the lower rectangular mounting holes on various quick attach buckets and other such FEL attachments? I am seeing quick attach buckets with one small lower mounting hole on each side, two holes on each side (one small and one medium size), and some heavier buckets with two larger holes (one medium size and one very big). I am also seeing buckets with just one small hole on each side but in a different position that my loader mount accommodates. Mama Mia!I always thought FEL "quick attach" was "quick attach"! Obviously I was wrong. I must assume from the size of the holes vs. attachment weight that this has something to do with different weight or strength ratings. Can anyone direct me to a website or document that explains the different lower mounting hole configurations that I am seeing on quick attach buckets and what they mean???Dougster

Are you interested in learning more about Sany Excavator Bucket Frog? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!